Search for: All records

Polar oceans and sea ice cover 15% of the Earth’s ocean surface, and the environment is changing rapidly at both poles. Improving knowledge on the interactions between the atmospheric and oceanic realms in the polar regions, a Surface Ocean–Lower Atmosphere Study (SOLAS) project key focus, is essential to understanding the Earth system in the context of climate change. However, our ability to monitor the pace and magnitude of changes in the polar regions and evaluate their impacts for the rest of the globe is limited by both remoteness and sea-ice coverage. Sea ice not only supports biological activity and mediates gas and aerosol exchange but can also hinder some in-situ and remote sensing observations. While satellite remote sensing provides the baseline climate record for sea-ice properties and extent, these techniques cannot provide key variables within and below sea ice. Recent robotics, modeling, and in-situ measurement advances have opened new possibilities for understanding the ocean–sea ice–atmosphere system, but critical knowledge gaps remain. Seasonal and long-term observations are clearly lacking across all variables and phases. Observational and modeling efforts across the sea-ice, ocean, and atmospheric domains must be better linked to achieve a system-level understanding of polar ocean and sea-ice environments. As polar oceans are warming and sea ice is becoming thinner and more ephemeral than before, dramatic changes over a suite of physicochemical and biogeochemical processes are expected, if not already underway. These changes in sea-ice and ocean conditions will affect atmospheric processes by modifying the production of aerosols, aerosol precursors, reactive halogens and oxidants, and the exchange of greenhouse gases. Quantifying which processes will be enhanced or reduced by climate change calls for tailored monitoring programs for high-latitude ocean environments. Open questions in this coupled system will be best resolved by leveraging ongoing international and multidisciplinary programs, such as efforts led by SOLAS, to link research across the ocean–sea ice–atmosphere interface. 

Abstract. The Arctic marine environment plays an important role inthe global carbon cycle. However, there remain large uncertainties in howsea ice affects air–sea fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO₂), partially dueto disagreement between the two main methods (enclosure and eddy covariance)for measuring CO₂ flux ( $F_{\mathrm{CO}{}_2}$). The enclosure method has appearedto produce more credible $F_{\mathrm{CO}{}_2}$ than eddy covariance (EC), but is notsuited for collecting long-term, ecosystem-scale flux datasets in suchremote regions. Here we describe the design and performance of an EC systemto measure $F_{\mathrm{CO}{}_2}$ over landfast sea ice that addresses the shortcomingsof previous EC systems. The system was installed on a 10m tower onQikirtaarjuk Island – a small rock outcrop in Dease Strait located roughly35km west of Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Thesystem incorporates recent developments in the field of air–sea gasexchange by measuring atmospheric CO₂ using a closed-path infrared gasanalyzer (IRGA) with a dried sample airstream, thus avoiding the known watervapor issues associated with using open-path IRGAs in low-flux environments.A description of the methods and the results from 4 months of continuousflux measurements from May through August 2017 are presented, highlightingthe winter to summer transition from ice cover to open water. We show thatthe dried, closed-path EC system greatly reduces the magnitude of measured $F_{\mathrm{CO}{}_2}$ compared to simultaneous open-path EC measurements, and for thefirst time reconciles EC and enclosure flux measurements over sea ice. Thisnovel EC installation is capable of operating year-round on solar and windpower, and therefore promises to deliver new insights into the magnitude ofCO₂ fluxes and their driving processes through the annual sea icecycle. 

Arctic sea-ice loss is emblematic of an amplified Arctic water cycle and has critical feedback implications for global climate. Stable isotopes (δ 18 O, δ 2 H, d-excess ) are valuable tracers for constraining water cycle and climate processes through space and time. Yet, the paucity of well-resolved Arctic isotope data preclude an empirically derived understanding of the hydrologic changes occurring today, in the deep (geologic) past, and in the future. To address this knowledge gap, the Pan-Arctic Precipitation Isotope Network (PAPIN) was established in 2018 to coordinate precipitation sampling at 19 stations across key tundra, subarctic, maritime, and continental climate zones. Here, we present a first assessment of rainfall samples collected in summer 2018 ( n = 281) and combine new isotope and meteorological data with sea ice observations, reanalysis data, and model simulations. Data collectively establish a summer Arctic Meteoric Water Line where δ 2 H = 7.6⋅δ 18 O–1.8 ( r 2 = 0.96, p < 0.01). Mean amount-weighted δ 18 O, δ 2 H, and d-excess values were −12.3, −93.5, and 4.9‰, respectively, with the lowest summer mean δ 18 O value observed in northwest Greenland (−19.9‰) and the highest in Iceland (−7.3‰). Southern Alaska recorded the lowest mean d-excess (−8.2%) and northern Russia the highest (9.9‰). We identify a range of δ 18 O-temperature coefficients from 0.31‰/°C (Alaska) to 0.93‰/°C (Russia). The steepest regression slopes (>0.75‰/°C) were observed at continental sites, while statistically significant temperature relations were generally absent at coastal stations. Model outputs indicate that 68% of the summer precipitating air masses were transported into the Arctic from mid-latitudes and were characterized by relatively high δ 18 O values. Yet 32% of precipitation events, characterized by lower δ 18 O and high d-excess values, derived from northerly air masses transported from the Arctic Ocean and/or its marginal seas, highlighting key emergent oceanic moisture sources as sea ice cover declines. Resolving these processes across broader spatial-temporal scales is an ongoing research priority, and will be key to quantifying the past, present, and future feedbacks of an amplified Arctic water cycle on the global climate system.